As ZK applications become more popular, the volume of proofs becomes more exaggerated. The question arises: who will efficiently verify them? Ethereum's mainnet is too expensive and slow, and many L2s are not specifically designed for verification, resulting in wasted computing power and poor user experience. @ZKVProtocol's approach is quite straightforward: Cost reduced by over 90% Millisecond-level verification speed Supports various proofs (SNARKs, STARKs, Groth16, UltraHonk) More importantly, it's no longer just theoretical: 2.7 million proofs verified, nearly 30,000 active addresses, and 400,000 people have tested it. It has also integrated with a bunch of ecosystems like ApeChain, Arbitrum, Ankr, Phala, etc. My personal view: Many projects in the ZK space are telling stories, but ZKV seems more like a "building infrastructure" role—while others talk about the future, it is working on the present. I believe that when the TGE comes out at the end of the month, the market...
Show original
8.64K
0
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.