零点分析📈

$NOT Breaking news, the Telegram ecosystem token $NOT (Notcoin) is performing strongly today on the OKX platform. Market sentiment has suddenly warmed up. ⚡ Let's start from the beginning. $NOT originally was a click-mining mini-game inside Telegram, where you tap the screen and get coins—simple and straightforward to an extreme. This little thing attracted over 30 million users. You might ask, what value does something like this have? The value lies in those 30 million users. In the crypto world, users are a scarce resource; whoever has the traffic holds the power of voice. 📡 From a horizontal perspective, tokens within the Telegram ecosystem are forming a sector, and $NOT is the leader. Unlike coins that are purely hyped on concepts, $NOT is backed by Telegram, a platform with 900 million users. This is not a project looking for users; it’s a platform incubating financial products. The logic is completely reversed. From a vertical perspective, $NOT evolved from a game item to an official token, and now to an entry-level asset in the Telegram ecosystem—this evolution path is very clear. It’s like the human immune system, starting from the simplest white blood cells and gradually building a complete defense mechanism. 🧩 Currently, there are a few macro factors worth noting: non-farm payroll data exceeded expectations but household surveys conflicted, the probability of a Fed rate cut is pushed down to 20%, and the market’s attitude toward risk assets is becoming cautious. But $NOT has something other meme coins don’t—it has real use cases. Within the Telegram ecosystem, $NOT can be used for payments, tipping, and governance participation—these are not just promises, they are already happening. Other meme coins tell a story about community; $NOT tells a story about a platform. Platform narratives usually have a higher ceiling but also more concentrated risks. If the Telegram ecosystem runs into trouble, $NOT will suffer along with it. So you need to evaluate two things simultaneously: the token itself and the platform behind it. Once you understand both clearly, it’s not too late to take action. 🎯 > Risk warning: The above content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Digital asset prices are highly volatile and investment risks are significant. Please make independent judgments and decisions based on your personal financial situation. #非农数据连续超出预期：降息预期走低 #美伊停火：MOU框架仍在推进 #在OKX交易美股：三大独角兽永续合约已上线 $BTC $ETH $SOL @OKX中文 @OKX成长学院 @OKX星球

$ENA Warning, before you decide to touch $ENA (Ethena), please first understand what you are dealing with. This is not a joke coin, not a meme, not a community consensus experiment; it is a financial engineering attempt to build a complete synthetic dollar system in the crypto world, and financial engineering often collapses much faster than it is built. 🏗️ $ENA is the governance token of the Ethena protocol, whose core product is USDe, a synthetic stablecoin. Unlike USDT, which is backed by dollars sitting in bank accounts, USDe relies on a delta-neutral strategy, hedging spot exposure by shorting perpetual contracts to maintain its peg. Simply put, it doesn’t rely on reserves, it relies on math. 🔩 This logic works well in normal markets; the supply of USDe has reached new highs, indicating increasing market acceptance. But the problem is, once the market experiences extreme volatility, the funding rates of perpetual contracts may fluctuate drastically, and at that time math might not save you. Historically, the stablecoin sector has experienced many crashes. From UST to various algorithmic stablecoins, every collapse has taught the same lesson: under stress tests, even sophisticated mechanism designs can fail. USDe is stronger than pure algorithmic stablecoins because it has hedging positions providing actual support, but it still faces tail risks. On the macro side, tensions in the Strait of Hormuz are rising, oil prices are increasing, gold is surging, and risk-off sentiment is spreading. In this environment, crypto market liquidity may tighten, and liquidity tightening hits complex financial protocols the hardest. ⚖️ Comparing horizontally with other DeFi projects, $COMP focuses on lending, $AAVE on lending and flash loans, and $ENA on synthetic assets. Each has its own risk structure and should not be conflated. What you need to do is understand USDe’s mechanism, know under what conditions it might fail, and then assess how much loss you can bear. This is not a token suitable for "buy first, ask later." You need to understand it first, then decide whether to engage. 🏛️ > Risk warning: The above content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Digital asset prices fluctuate significantly, and investment risks are high. Please make independent judgments and prudent decisions based on your personal financial situation. #非农数据连续超出预期：降息预期走低 #美伊停火：MOU框架仍在推进 #在OKX交易美股：三大独角兽永续合约已上线 $BTC $ETH $SOL @OKX中文 @OKX成长学院 @OKX星球

$ONDO The RWA sector has seen the scale of on-chain locked assets multiply several times over the past year. The number of tokenized U.S. Treasury products has doubled. Institutional capital is entering at the fastest pace in nearly three years. Traditional financial giants are beginning to experiment on-chain. Each of these data points alone is good news, but when viewed together, you have to ask one question: who is leading in this sector? The answer points to $ONDO (Ondo Finance). 🌱 What $ONDO does isn’t complicated—it brings real-world financial assets onto the blockchain. U.S. Treasuries, bonds, money market funds—these common Wall Street instruments are packaged into on-chain tokens, allowing crypto users to access them. The logic itself is sound; the challenge lies in execution. From a vertical perspective, the RWA concept has been talked about for years, but there are few real-world implementations. 🛤️ $ONDO stands out because it addresses a key need: crypto market funds require a low-risk exit. When the market cools, people don’t want to convert everything back to fiat and exit; they want a relatively safe place to stay. Tokenized U.S. Treasuries serve as that safe haven. The logic chain is: market risk aversion drives capital to RWA, RWA products need tokenization platforms, and $ONDO provides that platform. The more capital flows in, the greater the platform’s value and the higher the token demand. This cycle is still ongoing. But you must watch one variable: the Fed’s probability of cutting rates is down to 20%. If the interest rate environment changes, the attractiveness of Treasuries will also shift. RWA’s underlying assets are traditional financial products, and traditional financial logic doesn’t change just because it’s on-chain. Nonfarm payroll data exceeded expectations, employment looks good, but household surveys show a drop of over 200,000 people—macro signals are mixed. $ONDO’s price movement is closely tied to these macro data points, so you need to monitor both on-chain and off-chain data. 🌊 Comparatively, other projects like $MPL and $CFG are also competing in this sector. $ONDO has a clear first-mover advantage, but the competitive landscape is still evolving. What you need to judge is not whether $ONDO is good, but whether the RWA narrative can continue to be realized. If it can, $ONDO is likely the biggest beneficiary. If it can’t, it will also be the first to be corrected. ⚗️ > Risk Warning: The above content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Digital asset prices are highly volatile and investment risks are significant. Please make independent judgments and decisions based on your personal financial situation. #非农数据连续超出预期：降息预期走低 #美伊停火：MOU框架仍在推进 #在OKX交易美股：三大独角兽永续合约已上线 $BTC $ETH $SOL @OKX中文 @OKX成长学院 @OKX星球

$OM Did you know, today I reviewed the information on $OM (Mantra) and $COMP (Compound), and while reading, I was struck by how different the vibes of two projects in the same sector can be. $COMP is like an engineer sitting in a lab, focused on building infrastructure, not saying much. $OM is like a businessman in a suit socializing in the hallway, shaking hands and signing deals everywhere. Neither style is right or wrong, but who thrives more in competition depends on the market phase. 🎭 $OM is working on combining RWA and compliant DeFi, smartly choosing the path of "getting compliance right first before anything else." While many projects are still guerrilla-fighting regulators, $OM has already obtained compliance licenses in multiple jurisdictions. It's like the body's immune system: others are still relying on instinct to fight viruses, but it has already started vaccinating. ⚡ In this sector's horizontal competition, $ONDO focuses on tokenizing U.S. Treasury bonds, while $OM takes a broader approach to real-world asset compliance. There is overlap, but the strategies differ. $ONDO is like a sharp knife, cutting in one direction only. $OM is like a net, covering a wider area but possibly with less depth at each point compared to competitors. The CLARITY Act is up for review next week; if the regulatory framework becomes clearer, $OM's compliance advantage will be amplified. Conversely, if the act imposes stricter-than-expected limits on tokenized assets, $OM's entire narrative will need reassessment. 🔐 On the macro side, non-farm payroll data exceeded expectations, the probability of rate cuts dropped to 20%, and liquidity is tightening. In this environment, the DeFi projects that survive will be those with real business support; the era of storytelling based on concepts alone is over. Whether $OM's on-chain business is truly generating revenue is something you need to verify yourself. 🧩 Looking vertically, $OM has risen from a relatively obscure small project to a front-runner in the RWA sector, which itself indicates good team execution. But good execution does not equal the right direction. What you need to judge is how far the path of RWA compliance can go. This is a bet on institutional dividends: if you win, you benefit for a long time; if you lose, it's sunk cost. Think carefully before making a move. 🎯 > Risk Warning: The above content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Digital asset prices are highly volatile and investment risks are significant. Please make independent judgments and decisions based on your personal financial situation. #非农数据连续超出预期：降息预期走低 #美伊停火：MOU框架仍在推进 #在OKX交易美股：三大独角兽永续合约已上线 $BTC $ETH $SOL @OKX中文 @OKX成长学院 @OKX星球

$COMP I've been pondering a question: if DeFi were a building, what exactly is $COMP (Compound) within it? Is it the foundation, a load-bearing wall, or an old-fashioned electrical box forgotten in the basement? 🔩 To be honest, I'm not criticizing it. $COMP is one of the earliest pioneers in the DeFi lending space. It defined the liquidity mining model in the summer of 2020, which directly ignited the entire DeFi wave. But that was four years ago. In the crypto world, four years is almost like a geological era. Looking horizontally, the lending sector is now crowded with competitors. $AAVE overwhelmingly leads the market share, while newcomers like $Morpho and $Spark are steadily eating into the market. $COMP’s situation is a bit like a long-established shop in an old town district—locals still remember it, but new customers flock to the new malls. Vertically, $COMP has been iterating, launching multi-chain deployments, optimizing governance mechanisms, and experimenting with new product lines. But whether the pace of iteration can keep up with market changes is another question. Have you seen cases of old building renovations? Some successfully transform into trendy landmarks, while others run out of funds halfway and become abandoned projects. 🏗️ On the macro side, the probability of a Fed rate cut has dropped to 20%. The profit margins and interest rate environment of DeFi lending protocols are highly correlated. Weak rate cut expectations mean on-chain lending costs won’t drop quickly. This isn’t necessarily bad for lending protocols, but when market sentiment is conservative, capital tends to leave high-risk DeFi sectors. Non-farm payroll data looks good, but household surveys conflict; tensions in the Strait of Hormuz are rising, and risk aversion is increasing. In this environment, whether $COMP can hold its position depends on whether it can deliver something eye-catching. 🏛️ The CLARITY Act will be reviewed next week. If a DeFi regulatory framework is established, it could actually be beneficial for established compliant projects like $COMP. Clear rules encourage institutional participation. But these are all assumptions—you can’t make decisions based on assumptions. ⚖️ You need to look at $COMP’s on-chain data: its total value locked, lending balances, and active user trends—whether they are rising or falling. Numbers don’t lie. Whether it’s the foundation or ruins, the data will tell you the answer. > Risk warning: The above content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Digital asset prices are highly volatile and investment risks are significant. Please make independent judgments and decisions based on your personal financial situation. #非农数据连续超出预期：降息预期走低 #美伊停火：MOU框架仍在推进 #在OKX交易美股：三大独角兽永续合约已上线 $BTC $ETH $SOL @OKX中文 @OKX成长学院 @OKX星球

$SNX 2018. Synthetix was born. It was called Havven. 2019. Renamed. The synthetic asset track opened. 2020 DeFi summer. SNX locked value once ranked in the top five. 2021. V2 migration. Atomic swaps launched. The peak. 2022. Bear market. Protocol revenue plummeted. The team cut half of its staff. 2023. V3 architecture reconstruction. Multi-chain deployment started. 2024. Infinex product line spun off. Spot trading, perpetual contracts, cross-chain. 2025. The probability of a Fed rate cut dropped to 20%. Gold surged to a high. Nonfarm data far exceeded expectations. The market is looking for the next narrative. $SNX (Synthetix) is positioned as the synthetic asset minting engine in the DeFi world. You don’t need to actually hold crude oil; you just need exposure to the price of crude oil. That’s what SNX does. Users stake $SNX as collateral, and the protocol mints synthetic assets like sETH, sBTC, sUSD. The prices of these assets are anchored to real-world targets via oracles. Stakers bear the system debt. Traders’ profits or losses are all reflected in the debt pool. This is a sophisticated immune system. The staker’s role is like white blood cells, absorbing infection risks caused by market volatility while earning inflation rewards and fee shares. ⚡ Looking horizontally at the track, GMX does perpetuals, dYdX does order books, Gains does leverage. SNX’s differentiation lies in the breadth of synthetic assets. Others only do crypto pairs; SNX can bring forex, commodities, stock indices all on-chain. The core upgrade of V3 is breaking liquidity from a single debt pool into modular pools. Each market can independently configure parameters, isolating risk. It’s like evolving from a single-core processor to multi-core. Different tasks run on different cores without interference. 🔬 Infinex is SNX’s front-end application layer, personally driven by Kain Warwick. It makes the synthetic asset trading experience look like a centralized exchange. Account abstraction, keyless login, one-click cross-chain operations. The intent is to lower the threshold and pull retail investors back from CEX. Currently, DeFi TVL is recovering, and staking tracks are active again. SNX’s staking yield remains competitive, but debt risk also exists simultaneously. The Achilles’ heel of synthetic assets is the oracle. Price delays and liquidation cascades under extreme conditions are real threats. After news of the Strait of Hormuz clashes broke, oil prices fluctuated violently. If someone longs oil and gas synthetic assets on SNX, stakers have to bear that debt. 🧩 The SNX protocol is like an athlete undergoing continuous high-intensity training. Cardiopulmonary function is iterating, muscle memory is accumulating. But there is no eternal champion in the arena. It needs narrative cycles, on-chain activity support, and the team to find a balance between product and marketing. For novice traders, the key to understanding SNX is not to look at the price but to understand the entire synthetic asset mechanism. The moment you stake, you are bound to the whole system. > Risk warning: The above content is for informational reference only and does not constitute investment advice. Digital asset prices fluctuate significantly, investment risks are high, please make independent judgments and prudent decisions based on your personal financial situation. #非农数据连续超出预期：降息预期走低 #美伊停火：MOU框架仍在推进 #在OKX交易美股：三大独角兽永续合约已上线 $TON $BTC $ETH @OKX中文 @OKX成长学院 @OKX星球

$LDO "So what exactly does Lido do?" "Well, it helps you stake ETH." "Can't I stake it myself?" "You can, but you need to gather 32 ETH and run a node that stays online 24/7. Can you manage that?" "No, I can't." "That's why Lido does it for you. You put your ETH in, it gives you stETH, and you just hold it and do whatever you want." $LDO (Lido DAO) plays exactly this role. It is the largest infrastructure service provider in the Ethereum staking space, bar none. You don’t need to understand server maintenance or what validator keys are; all you need is a wallet and some ETH. Behind the scenes, Lido allocates your ETH to a group of vetted node operators. They run the validators for you and collect rewards, which automatically accumulate in your stETH. This model is like an ecosystem of a river. 💧 Regular users are the upstream rain, dropping in bit by bit. Node operators are the midstream dams, holding back water to generate power. Lido is the basin management authority, responsible for water rights allocation, dam maintenance, and flood control. The DAO is the basin council, where $LDO holders vote to set the rules. Lido’s market share in Ethereum staking has been controversial. Some think one player dominating is unhealthy; others believe the market has chosen the answer. Controversy aside, data doesn’t lie. Amid DeFi TVL recovery, stETH remains the most liquid staking derivative, widely accepted as collateral across major lending protocols. Holding stETH, you can borrow stablecoins on Aave, provide liquidity on Curve, or use it as building blocks in various protocols. That’s the power of ecological niches. 🎭 Of course, the concentration of node operators is a concern. If several major operators fail simultaneously, slashing penalties would affect all stETH holders. Lido V3’s modular design aims to address this by introducing stVaults, allowing users with different risk preferences to choose different validator combinations. To analogize, it’s like everyone used to take the same road, but now you have multiple lanes—you can pick the less crowded one or the shorter but congested one. The governance rights of $LDO itself are also evolving. Previously, voting power was concentrated in large holders’ hands; now the community is pushing various delegation mechanisms to involve more people. Capturing value through governance tokens has always been a gray area. Whether and when fee sharing will be implemented has been discussed for years. But one thing remains unchanged: as long as Ethereum keeps running, staking demand exists. As long as Lido remains the largest gateway, its position won’t be easily shaken. For newcomers, understanding Lido is understanding half of Ethereum staking. The other half is the tug-of-war between it and all other competitors. 🌱 > Risk Warning: The above content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Digital asset prices are highly volatile and investment risks are significant. Please make independent judgments and prudent decisions based on your personal financial situation. #非农数据连续超出预期：降息预期走低 #美伊停火：MOU框架仍在推进 #在OKX交易美股：三大独角兽永续合约已上线 $BTC $ETH $SOL @OKX中文 @OKX成长学院 @OKX星球

$RPL What would happen if 60% of Ethereum's validator nodes went offline simultaneously one day? This is not an apocalypse prophecy. This is the question Rocket Pool has been trying to answer. $RPL (Rocket Pool) is a decentralized Ethereum staking protocol. Its fundamental difference from other staking services lies in one word: threshold. Lido requires thirty-two ETH, but the selection of node operators is centralized. Rocket Pool only requires sixteen ETH plus a certain amount of $RPL as collateral, and anyone can become a node operator. No application process. No whitelist. The code is the rule. This is like the logic of building a bridge.🔩 Traditional staking services hire a large construction company to build the entire bridge. It's efficient and fast, but if this company encounters problems, the whole bridge is at risk. Rocket Pool’s approach is to break the bridge into countless standardized prefabricated parts, distributed to independent construction teams worldwide. Each team only needs to build their responsible section, which is then assembled into the whole. If a single team has issues, it won’t cause the entire bridge to collapse. This architecture offers a crushing advantage in decentralization. When the Federal Reserve’s rate cut probability drops to 20%, but the Nasdaq breaks through highs, the game between traditional finance and crypto enters a new phase, making the resilience of decentralized infrastructure especially important. Rocket Pool’s Atlas upgrade lowered the node collateral from sixteen ETH to eight ETH, further reducing the participation threshold. At the same time, it introduced the megapools mechanism, allowing a node to run multiple validators simultaneously, significantly diluting gas costs. This is equivalent to upgrading the construction teams’ equipment. Previously, they could only carry one brick at a time; now they can carry a whole box. But the flip side is that a lower threshold means higher node operation risks. Whether novice users can maintain nodes well and whether network quality will be uneven are real engineering challenges. The $RPL token acts as a security deposit in the protocol. Node operators must stake a certain proportion of $RPL, and if they act maliciously or go offline, their staked RPL will be forfeited. This design ties token value to network security. The more nodes there are, the greater the demand for RPL. The higher the node quality, the more stable the RPL value. Recently, the staking sector has become active again, and TVL is rising. But Rocket Pool’s market share still lags far behind Lido. It’s like a remote but sturdy railway branch line. The main line is full of trains, while the branch line has fewer trips, but it has higher redundancy and a lower probability of failure propagation.🏗️ For beginner traders, Rocket Pool represents a philosophy. Not the biggest, but possibly the one that best aligns with Ethereum’s decentralization spirit. When you stake $RPL, you’re not just betting on a token; you’re betting on a whole philosophy about "who guards the network."⚖️ > Risk warning: The above content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Digital asset prices fluctuate significantly, and investment risks are high. Please make independent judgments and prudent decisions based on your personal financial situation. #非农数据连续超出预期：降息预期走低 #美伊停火：MOU框架仍在推进 #Coinbase-Q1净亏损近$4亿 $BTC $ETH $SOL @OKX中文 @OKX成长学院 @OKX星球

$BLUR The NFT market trading volume experienced a structural change in Q2 2025. The share of professional trading tools surpassed ordinary listings for the first time. $BLUR (Blur) is currently the largest NFT trading aggregation platform on the Ethereum chain, designed for professional traders. It is not like OpenSea’s gallery browsing experience. It is an exchange. 🛒 The interface is extremely simple. Floor price, order book depth, historical transactions—all visible on one screen. Batch buying, batch listing, real-time price refresh—every feature is designed around one goal: enabling traders to make the maximum number of decisions in the shortest time. Blur’s airdrop strategy caused a stir in the NFT community. Points, bid points, listing points—three incentive systems run in parallel. It uses token subsidies to attract traders away from OpenSea. In comparison, OpenSea is a department store, Magic Eden is a cross-border market, and Blur is the trading hall of a securities exchange. It doesn’t care if the NFT you buy looks good. It cares whether the order executes fast enough and the slippage is small enough. The BLUR token functions include governance voting and incentive distribution. Holders can vote to decide protocol parameters and fee structures. But Blur’s real ambition is beyond NFT trading itself. It launched Blend, an NFT lending protocol. It turns NFTs from "buy and hold" into "buy and use as collateral to borrow money." This step is crucial. It adds a financial attribute to NFTs. Gold and silver work the same way in the traditional world. You buy gold bars, you can pledge them for loans, trade futures, or split them into shares. 🎭 Blur applies the same logic to on-chain JPEGs. Currently, DeFi TVL is recovering, and market funds are looking for new narrative carriers. NFT-Fi is one such branch. However, liquidity remains the core bottleneck in the NFT market. Image-based NFTs have no cash flow; their valuation relies entirely on consensus. Consensus comes quickly and disappears just as fast. Blur’s floor price bidding mechanism does provide liquidity depth to some extent. But in extreme market conditions, if buyers cancel orders and the floor price collapses, liquidation risks multiply. When news from the Strait of Hormuz causes traditional assets to fluctuate violently, on-chain funds also seek to hedge. NFTs are usually the first category to be sold off. For novice traders, Blur is a tool, not a belief. It helps you trade more efficiently, but what to trade and at what price requires your own judgment. 🐕 > Risk Warning: The above content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Digital asset prices are highly volatile and investment risks are significant. Please make independent judgments and decisions based on your personal financial situation. #在OKX交易美股：三大独角兽永续合约已上线 #美国4月非农今夜公布：预期仅6.2万 #美伊交火：特朗普称停火仍有效 $BTC $ETH $SOL @OKX中文 @OKX成长学院 @OKX星球

$1INCH You go to the market to buy vegetables. The potatoes at the east stall are 2 yuan per jin, and at the west stall, they are 1.8 yuan, but you’re too lazy to compare each one. So you find a purchasing agent who runs around the entire market to find the cheapest stall for you and conveniently rounds off the change. $1INCH is an on-chain purchasing agent. It doesn’t sell anything. It helps you find who sells the cheapest. $1INCH (1inch Network) is a DEX aggregator. You input the token and amount you want to buy, it scans dozens of decentralized exchanges to find the optimal price path and executes the trade for you in one go. Sometimes it splits your order into several parts. 30% goes through Uniswap, 40% through Curve, and the rest through SushiSwap. It chooses the path with the lowest slippage and fees. This logic chain is very clear: input demand, break down paths, compare quotes, execute trades, output results. The core capability of the purchasing agent is information asymmetry and execution efficiency.🔍 1inch’s Fusion mode goes further. It introduces professional market makers to compete to fill user orders. Users don’t pay gas fees; market makers pay because they profit from the spread. It’s like you hire a purchasing agent who doesn’t charge you a service fee but earns from the price difference. Everyone gets what they need. In the current market environment, with the Fed’s rate cut expectations cooling and Nasdaq at a high, capital flows quickly between markets, increasing the frequency and complexity of on-chain trading. The value of DEX aggregators is amplified in this environment. The more frequent the trades, the more urgent the need to find the best price. The functions of the 1inch token include governance and protocol fee distribution rights. But competition in the aggregator space has always been fierce. Paraswap, CowSwap, and 0x API are all competing for the same pie. The fate of aggregators depends on the prosperity of the underlying DEX ecosystem. The more active DeFi is and the deeper the pools, the more room aggregators have to operate. Conversely, if on-chain trading volume shrinks, aggregators are the first to feel the chill. It’s like the human circulatory system. DEXs are the heart, liquidity is the blood, and aggregators are the network of blood vessels. No matter how intricate the vessels are, if the heart doesn’t beat, it’s useless.🧩 For beginners, 1inch is a practical tool. Using it to trade usually saves you a bit compared to placing orders directly on a single DEX. But the savings might not cover the time cost of learning to use it. A tool is a good tool. The key is whether you need this level of tool.⚡ > Risk warning: The above content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Digital asset prices fluctuate significantly, and investment risks are high. Please make independent judgments and decisions based on your personal financial situation. #在OKX交易美股：三大独角兽永续合约已上线 #美国4月非农今夜公布：预期仅6.2万 #美伊交火：特朗普称停火仍有效 $BTC $ETH $SOL @OKX中文 @OKX成长学院 @OKX星球